内容摘要
1933年3月10日,国民政府财政部发布《废两改元令》,规定所有公私款项收付、契约票据及一切交易、一律改用银币,不得再用银两,中国币制开始废用银两,改用银元。中国近现代史上,政府实行“物资本位”制度,即纸币发行以物资作为准备金,货币和物资挂钩,通过物资的买卖维持币值稳定。国民政府发行的纸币,经历了“银本位制”“外汇本位制”“金银本位制”数次变革,其以外汇、黄金作为准备金,将币值和金银、外汇相挂钩。这两种货币制度,不仅特点各异,而且结果一成一败,对于两个政权的控制区域,也造成了截然相反的结果。
关键字:废两改元 国统区 解放区 货币制度
目 录
绪论·························································· 4
一、国统区和解放区差异的货币制度······························· 5
(一)国统区的货币制度········································· 5
1、法币制度的确立········································· 5
2、法币制度的崩溃和失败的“币制改革”······················ 6
(二)解放区的货币制度······································ 7
1、解放区的纸币发行状况··································· 7
2、纸币与实物挂钩的“物资本位“制度······················· 7
二、 二者货币制度的不同造成的通货膨胀的不同结果 ·············· 9
(一) 国统区纸币制度下通货膨胀概况························ 9
1、1946年通胀的加速····································· 9
2、1948年11月后通货膨胀的失控和经济崩溃 ················10
3、国统区通货膨胀的影响·································· 10
(二)解放区“物资本位”制度下的通货膨胀 ··················· 12
1、解放区温和的通货膨胀·································· 12
2、解放区通货膨胀的结果和影响···························· 12
三、二者差异的启示··········································· 13
(一)两种非常态货币制度的优劣比较························· 13
1、解放区“物资本位”制度的比较优势······················ 13
2、国统区货币制度的弊端···································14
(二)在通胀中货币的本质和职能的体现························14
1、在通货膨胀状况下货币职能的退化·························14
2、通胀中货币本质的体现——购买力·························14
(三)对于现代国家货币制度建设的启示······················ 14
1、“物资本位”制度对于现代国家货币制度的启示··············14
2、控制好货币量是稳定货币制度的重要途径之一·············· 14
结语··························································15
参考文献······················································17
致谢··························································18