合议庭办案责任制研究

目  录

摘要·····················································

研究合议庭办案责任制的背景····························

二、合议庭承担办案责任的范围···························

现行法律对合议庭责任范围的界定·······················

考核意义上的责任范围——实践中合议庭的主要责任范围·······

三、合议庭办案责任的承担··································

（一）合议庭的集体责任···································

（二）合议庭成员的内部责任································

1.不同责任类别的内部责任差异·····························

2.不同职责造成的内部责任差异·····························

四、合议庭办案责任制的完善································

   （一）完善合议庭办案责任制的原则···························

责任追究与责任豁免相辅相成·······························

      2.集体责任与个人责任相互衔接·······························

      3.内部责任分配具体化、情形化·································

   （二）合议庭办案责任制的具体完善建议····························        

      1立法正面划定合议庭办案责任范围···························

      2.改革以承办人为对象的现行考核制度·························     

      3 健全配套制度以促进合议庭办案责任制的落实·················

参考文献·················································

合议庭办案责任制研究

一、研究合议庭办案责任制的背景

根据我国《宪法》第126条规定，人民法院依法独立行使审判权，而我国《民事诉讼法》第三章“审判组织”、《刑事诉讼法》第三编第一章“审判组织”、《行政诉讼法》第68条与第83条以及《人民法院组织法》第9条均规定合议庭是我国法院最基本的审判组织，代表法院行使审判权。审判权包括审理权和裁判权，适用合议庭的案件，理应由合议庭集中、排他行使审理权与裁判权并承担对应的责任，然而在司法实践中，裁判文书签署制度、审判委员会制度、请示制度等在一定程度上致使案件审理权与裁判权分离，违背了司法权的亲历性，影响了审判独立的落实。新一轮司法改革提出“让审理者裁判，让裁判者负责”的宗旨，目的不仅在于实现法院的审判独立（即外部独立），还应包括保障合议庭的审判独立（即内部独立），让合议庭独立行使案件审理权和裁判权。